[border]

How many store catalogs did you get in the mail this holiday season?  At home, I had a pile about two feet high-with about 75 or more catalogs from brick and mortar shops such as Brookstone, Eddie Bauer, L.L. Bean, Victoria’s Secret and online/direct mail only brands such as Harry & David, Catalog Favorites, Solutions, Red Envelope, etc.   At work, I had a pile of about 14 from the same brands AND from obscure “how did they get my name” places like Fairytale Brownies.

I reluctantly admit that I read through every single one of those catalogs-I circled items, I compared costs on like objects, and the content became reading material of wishful thinking for me after getting home from a hard day’s work.  I actually enjoyed the time I put aside to look at the mail order catalogs after my son was in bed and my husband was absorbed in the local hockey game.  I’m a busy mom so this downtime, in an effort to not feel unproductive, became “necessary preparatory work” for the holidays.

But what was illuminating to me was that my purchasing behavior only extended down two pathways.  The first was that I ordered online for only a few purchases that I had picked out for gifts from the catalogs.  The second was that I remembered and/or noted specials on my Blackberry memo pad when I was actually in stores where I could handle the items tactiley.  Not once did I reach for a phone to call in my order.  And as strong as my wishful thinking was, it did not translate into actual purchases for many of what I would have bought had I had more money to spend.

(more…)

Photo courtesy of William Stadler and stock.xchngThis past weekend, a few of the kids in my neighborhood came over to our house to play with my daughter. The group, ranging in ages from 5 to 9, went off to the family room for a while, and for about within 15 minutes things were pretty quiet.

“Dad, you have to come eat at our restaurant,” called my daughter.

When I walked into the family room the scene was abuzz with activity. Kids were rushing around everywhere with toy food, plates, utensils and cookware. Each was wearing a few articles of dress-up clothes and busily handling different jobs in what appeared to be a pretend restaurant.

The Brand Concept

“Welcome to Fasty’s, where our specialty is super fast service!” said the eight-year-old as I was lead to a small table set for dinner. I sat down and within seconds had toy bread, cookies and a drink cup set in front of me. “Can I take your order?”

These kids didn’t just imagine a pretend restaurant, but they named it, branded it and gave it a very specific niche: super fast service. They were wearing uniforms to show that they were part of a team and from the amount of running back and forth that we going on they were certainly being true to the brand image that they had created.

The Brand Experience

I was impressed, so I gave them my order. The two kids rushed around gathering up the toy food that I had requested and delivered it at almost a sprint to my table. Meanwhile a third brought over a new drinking cup “in case I wanted something else to drink”, and a fourth brought over some wooden cupcakes which were “on the house”. I was told that it was to make sure that I had a wonderful time here at Fasty’s.

So these elementary school aged kids had not only created a differentiated brand, but everything that they were doing was contributing to that brand experience. And they threw in a few premiums to ensure that my experience with that brand was a positive one. Good thinking.

Customer Relationships, Two-Way Dialogue and the Web

Finally, after I had pretended to eat all the food that had been placed in front of me, the 9-year-old came over to the table.

“Hi, I’m the manager,” she shook my hand. “We’re so glad that you came in to eat at Fasty’s. I hope that you had a wonderful time here. Please leave us some feedback on our website. It’s at www.fastys.com. We would really appreciate it.”

Wow. My first thought was ‘This kid eats out too much.’ But then it occurred to me that, not only did these kids understand the importance of developing great customer relationships with a personal touch and the need to create a two-way dialogue with customers, but they understood a bit about the web as a marketing tool. I was impressed. They probably don’t know that they understand these things, of course. To them, that’s just the way things are when you have a business.

A clearly differentiated brand with a strong concept behind it. A consistent experience that support that brand position. Great customer service and extra touches to ensure it. Two-way dialogue with the consumer. And digital taking an integral role. These are all essential elements for building most brands these days, but how often do we as marketers cut corners when it comes to these things, or ignore them altogether? Too often. Perhaps we can learn - or at least be reminded of - a thing or two about brand building from a bunch of kids playing restaurant.

So the next time that you take a look at your own brand, ask yourself: “what would a kid do?”

There has been a lot of debate lately about whether or not TV spots should get tagged with the web site URL. Seems like a no brainer. But we’ve gotten some pushback from clients on 15-second spots in particular, where the message needs to be crystal clear and words and visuals are at a premium. Before you cut the URL from the storyboard, consider this:

 

Last September, we had two products in the same category go on air.

 

Product A tagged their spot with a web address. It was simply an onscreen super.

Product B did not.

 

During the first month of launch, Product A experienced a 1017% increase in site traffic.

Product B’s traffic increased by only 122%. The net difference was a 403% lift in site traffic for Product A.

 

So add the URL! Better still, promote your site in the voice over. And don’t forget to greet the user with an engaging experience when they land there.

To improve conversions, focus on providing relevant and persuasive content based on a sound understanding of visitor intent. Persuade on every page. Link pages together to guide visitors along the way. Hold their hands, and anticipate their every move. Make them feel comfortable and in control.

The more time a visitor spends on your site, the more likely she is to buy. Shopping carts experience the highest drop-off in the first two or three pages. Once they’re into the process, drop-off rates decline precipitously.

More e-Commerce best practices:

(more…)

In case you missed it, Brunner’s Chief Digital Officer and Silicon Angle founder Mark ‘Rizzn’ Hopkins had an interesting discussion about the biggest digital trends of 2009.  We would love to hear your thoughts as to what the biggest trends were!

thumbnail1

Not that long ago, I got the chance to speak at Advertising Week DC, and presented a case study of a piece we did for DeVry University. I call it a “piece,” but really it’s a whole bunch of tightly-meshed moving parts that include a mobile app; a live, projected classroom presentation, a 3D world with avatars and quirky aliens, a site, custom email follow-up, and some social tools that, collectively, help establish an engaging and ongoing relationship between DeVry and prospective students.

The “piece” is cool — which is probably why it was a Mobi finalist in two categories — with the likes of Fanta and Comedy Central. But the presentation I gave wasn’t just about the mechanics of the parts. It was about the kind of thinking that defines — or should define — creative in a contemporary agency setting.

When I started in the business, which was longer ago than I will specify here, I was a copywriter. I worked with words. They paired me with an art director, who’s specialty was pictures. Together, our job was to combine words and pictures, and fit them into a pre-determined space, defined primarily by physical dimensions or time. Occasionally, when we were paying close attention, context also entered into it. Our goal was to be really clever with those words and pictures — clever enough to distract a target from his or her primary goal, just long enough to get in a good word about our client’s brand. And that was the essence of advertising creativity: Being really good at combining words and pictures, in spaces someone had already set aside for you.

I don’t have to tell you that times have changed for you to know that times have changed. The opportunity, technology, and culture certainly exist in our digital world for creatives to think, not just in terms of words and pictures, but in terms of, “What if?”

Beyond working in predetermined spaces, creatives are now required to think in terms of experience — and that doesn’t just open new doors, so much as it removes the concept of closed doors altogether. Online, anything is possible — or a reasonable and accepted facsimile of anything is possible, anyway — which means when you’re creating you can pretty much create anything in the way of an experience for a prospective fan of your client’s brand. The question isn’t “What’s the headline?” so much as it is: “What happens next?” and “What if it/they did this?” All of which makes advertising in general, and creative in particular, harder than it used to be. More fun, but harder.

In order to combat that difficulty, and assign some sort of predictable monetary value to pieces of an endless online space, we’ve carved that space into lots of more predictable units of predetermined size and shape. There are banners, sites, microsites, fan pages, groups, tweets, and a whole host of other pre-defined spaces on the web, just waiting for creatives to fill them. Pretty much all of them are extremely useful — some, even critical. All benefit from the creatives’ skill. But if you take them all — every last one of them — and pile them together, they still don’t make even a tiny dent in the universe of possibilities. The web isn’t a zero-sum game like broadcast or printed publications. There can always be more pixels. Which means the pixels can always do something to create an experience that no one has experienced yet.

Words and pictures are still important. In fact, that’s an understatement. Recent studies finally prove what creatives have known all along — that the quality of the creative has a huge impact on the effectiveness of online advertising. But words and pictures aren’t the only elements of creative anymore. Creative has moving parts. Lots of them. When they mesh together properly, they create an experience. And that experience can be, literally, anything. If you want to make it good, understanding existing and emerging tools is the cost of entry. If, however, you want to change the game, begin with a simple question:

“What if?”

I loved the Droid campaign from the moment I saw the “iDon’t” ads, though my affection wasn’t about product preference or interest. I’ve also loved the Apple campaign ever since Justin Long came on board. Simply put, I love competitive depositioning and am fascinated anytime a company has the right product, leadership and balls-to-the-wall attitude to make it happen. But today my fascination skyrocketed when I finally visited droiddoes.com and checked out their micro site on launch day. I went to the live feed called “Droid Does Times Square” where it took me a minute to figure out that they were showing off the phone’s differentiating voice search functionality by letting passersby call in and “search Times Square just like the Droid does.” And with the micro site live feed, anyone in the world could participate. At noon on Friday Nov. 6,  it was a 3.5 hr wait to run your own Droid voice activated search.

 

 

droid-does-times-square

 

I forwarded this to my colleagues and said, “I have no idea what kind of emerging media this is, but it’s wild.”  Digital billboards in Time Square connected to mobile marketing, web integration, a PR campaign that yielded thousands of articles, experiential / engagement and here I am, blogging about it and boosting their social media results.  This seemingly small piece of a micro site had so many moving parts and pieces it had to take the kind of collaboration that in marketing sometimes seems unnatural or forced.   What caught my eye was how the idea works across all disciplines fairly seamlessly – one-to-one, digital, PR, media, creative, experiential, and mobile. Of course, the meeting of the minds that had to occur between giants like Google, Motorola and Verizon and their respective agencies must have been somewhat akin to herding really smart cats.

 

 

Switching gears slightly…I spent the first 8 years of my career in tech PR, and for 5 years, IBM was one of my major clients – which required me to get to know the tech services industry a little better than your average flack. And lately, I’ve been feeling like the marketing industry could take some notes from the tech integrators. IBM has long taken on Microsoft by pushing open source, open standards and open technologies, believing that the money is in the services and a longer relationship than could be established through the more transactional hardware and software industries (though other trends are changing that).  By being hardware and software neutral, they can provide the complete solution that’s right for their client’s unique need. Rather than pushing the same product or variation on it for everyone, they have the freedom to look at the entire business, and aren’t limited by corporate  requirement to incorporate their own products (though they certainly have them). It’s a model that’s served IBM well.

 

 

What if our industry moved towards “open marketing” model, where it’s not about the right digital solution or the right PR campaign or the right creative or the right social media strategy or the right customer loyalty program.  Yes, those things always have their place, but more often than not, there’s a bigger picture and a bigger opportunity. It’s a model that just puts a bunch of smart, un-like-minded individuals in a  room and lets them go at a client’s business. We’re seeing glimpses of it, and here at Brunner we’ve eliminated our individual profit centers to eliminate the pressures of unique P&L’s and have established dedicated, multi-disciplinary teams to do just that type of thinking. But it’s not a shift that took hold over night and it’s a constant cultural evolution. We’re always adapting because there’s a lot of power in a lot of minds and that’s not always easy to harness. It’s a process that sometimes seems like it can’t happen fast enough.

 

 

I’m not sure how many business out there are breaking down those walls fast enough, but I can tell you this much – it’s something Droiddoes.

“If You Can Type, You Can Make Movies”

Such is the promise from a new service called xtra normal, which allows any bloke who can type make an interesting animated movie. Short form, long form, public, private and shareable.

We played around a bit—it couldn’t be easier to use—and thought one usage could be a more entertaining thought leadership platform. 

Content remains king. And as the content experience becomes more competitive (the written page evolved to podcast evolved to video blog), everyone needs a better way to break through.

So what’s next?  Watch epidsode 1:  Search Engine Optimization

Maintaining your brand in social networks like Facebook or Twitter takes time.

Maintaining your brand in social networks takes time.

Social media is inexpensive, right? Maintaining a company blog, keeping your brand active on Twitter and Facebook, and participating in online forums and discussions - it all seems like it would be cheap, doesn’t it? There are relatively low production costs; usually nothing approaching the hundreds of thousands of dollars it costs to produce a typical TV Spot or web site, or even the tens of thousands it often takes to create a print ad. And there is no large mass media buy, which is often the largest expense in a brand’s marketing budget. So if building and maintaining relationships for your brand through social media doesn’t take a ton of money, what is the cost?

The cost is time. A lot of time.

Establishing a presence in the social media space isn’t quick, and it’s certainly not something that you do once and then allow to run on its own. Just like any relationship, you need to put in the time and effort to listen, respond and offer something of interest on a regular basis. Monitoring online conversations, responding when necessary and generating a steady stream of content to keep people interested generally requires dedicated effort on a daily, if not hourly, basis. And once you start, you’re committed: if you stop communicating regularly then the relationship fades.

This sounds like a lot of work, and to be honest, it is. But if the alternative is that your brand isn’t present where millions of people are spending their time, or if you’re present but largely silent, then doing what it takes to for you brand to live - and prosper - in the social sphere is well worth it. It’s where the people are, and to be noticed you need to visible and active. So commit part of your brand team to maintaining a social presence. Hire people dedicated to social media or enlist the help of an agency that knows what it’s doing in the social space. Your brand will thank you, even if you need to spend some extra time to get results.

In Jack Neff’s October 12, 2009 Advertising Age article, Why it’s time to do away with the brand manager, that discussed the new roles for marketing in the social media age, Jack interviewed Denuo CEO Rishad Tobaccowala, a longtime thought leader on digital marketing. Mr. Tobaccowala stated that “the brand manager model of the future may be adapted from venture-funded startups or political campaigns.” As an advertising and marketing professional who has an undergraduate degree in Political Science and who has also worked on several political campaigns, the latter reference caught my attention.  Tobaccowala goes on to say that “political campaigns which run on rapid iterations, real-time data monitoring and full recognition of the interplay between public relations, social media and advertising - may provide another model for the future of marketing organizations.”   Interestingly, I have made similar statements over the past year. I believe that political campaigns aren’t just a possible model for marketing organizations, but rather they are the new paradigm. Below are four reasons why:
  • They engage. Maybe it’s because of the events or the door-to-door canvassing or the campaign activists themselves or a culmination of these things, but political campaigns got the engagement aspect of digital and social media straightaway. And they’re not afraid of it. When you go door-to-door, you know each time you go out at least one person if not more will tear into you about the candidate. You might have protesters at your events. You listen, learn and if appropriate alter aspects of the campaign. It’s no surprise then that unenthusiastic comments on a campaign blog, in related forum or on a candidate’s Facebook Wall won’t rattle a campaign. It’s expected and sometimes even welcome. Brand marketers need to engage the consumer and understand it won’t always be pleasant, but it will be productive.
  • They manage flux. The landscape of an electoral campaign is constantly changing. A prominent benefactor in a key district pulls her support. The opposition has only agreed to 1 debate instead of 3. New polling shows you dropped 3 points in a week. Political campaigns don’t panic. And they definitely don’t ignore these fluctuations. Rather, they remain calm and set-up action plans that may again need to be adapted in the not too distant future. For brand marketers, the new media terrain undulates in a similar fashion. Organizations need to accept a fast-paced, irregular marketing environment and arrange their teams appropriately.
  • They respond rapidly. Campaigns have “War Rooms” to quickly assess information and respond rapidly. What brand marketing organizations have “War Rooms?” With social media listening services like Radian6, Collective Intellect and Sprial16, you know immediately what is being said about your brand. The Motrin case study from last fall illustrates the need for brands to adopt a rapid response mindset and competency.
  • They’re staffed appropriately. Properly engaging voters, managing flux and responding rapidly require bodies, lots and lots of bodies. And not just anyone. Competent, talented and passionate professionals. A campaign’s headquarters is often bustling with many, many consultants, paid campaign workers and volunteers. And all of this is expensive. Like political campaigns, digital and social media marketing and real-time measurement and analysis is human resource intensive. And like political campaigns, it’s not cheap. Yet marketers are currently cutting their staffs and squeezing their agencies. If marketers wish to be successful in this new social media age, they must recognize the true investment required.