[border]

sky-fallingRecently, articles have appeared in the New York Times and the USA Today announcing that people are leaving Facebook. NPR broadcasted a related story a few weeks ago as well. The coverage typically consists of interviews with a handful people that experienced Facebook burnout. These individuals were swallowed up in a Facebook frenzy they say, constantly updating their status and attempting to comment on all of their friends’ updates as well. It’s all too much for them. They must get out and leave Facebook behind. A few brand marketers have cited these articles as evidence that Facebook is in the midst of jumping the shark. Well, Facebook isn’t Fonzie in the Happy Days Hollywood episode.

First, the journalistic integrity of these stories is dubious. A dozen or so interviews do not make a trend. None of the stories cite any statistics supporting the claim that people are leaving Facebook in droves. In fact, the USA Today story actually admits the contrary:

Even tens of thousands of dropouts represent a fallen leaf in the forest of social networkers happily updating their status/thoughts/whereabouts at this very moment.

Second, all activities, even ones overtly labeled as healthy such as exercise, when pursued obsessively will have a negative impact on the quality of one’s life. So if you feel compelled to update your status every hour on Facebook, yeah, you’re going to burnout. You need downtime. In real life, are we always with our friends and our family? No, we take individual time. Social media is no different. It is merely tool for interaction. We control the level of interaction. We control the amount of time. We are always are in control. This extends to what you wish to share and what you won’t, pictures, videos, etc.

From a few personal friendships, I know that alcoholics feel great joy and freedom when they no longer imbibe. Yet, tens of millions of others regularly consume alcohol with no ill effect on their lives whatsoever. The growth of alcohol sales has not dwindled with the rise of AA nor do I see the demise of social networks like Facebook with the minority who choose to disconnect. The sky is not falling and neither is Facebook.

Digital ideas to help you sustain attendance (and look smart in the process)

It’s been an unpleasant year for the tradeshow marketer. No one is traveling (ouch) and attendance levels have dwindled as a result. Nice knowin’ ya, Vegas boondoggle.

In response, tradeshow marketers are scrambling to find new ways to reach members, buyers, prospects and exhibitors. Some have even have migrated their content entirely online (cool!). But let’s face it. There’s no replacement for the personal interaction that occurs on the tradeshow floor or at the hotel bar.

EDITORS NOTE:  There’s one shining star in the virtual tradeshow world. TED does a wonderful job of making you feel like you’re really there. But don’t overlook that TED, at its core, is still an in-person show.

What follows is a quick reference guide on tradeshow tactics for the digital age. CAVEAT: Strategy comes before tactics (but that’s not the promise of this post). (more…)

Shaun Quigley, VP / Interactive Practice Director in Brunner’s DC office talks WOM with Capitol Communicator TV:

[yellow tail] wine. Run a Google news search and you’ll see a couple small articles in agriculture blogs and webzines. Visit their facebook page, and they have a couple thousand fans. Start reading their FB wall, and you’ll be reading for hours.

How does a cheap wine with little news or substantial social media audience gin up thousands of social media comments / conversations in less than 24 hours?  Well, it seems that pissing off the agriculture industry will do it.  Their fans are, in fact, boycotting their product.  Their fans just signed up as fans just to tell the brand they suck and have, more or less, just lost another customer.

As one of the original critter wines, it probably seemed like a stroke of marketing genius when they announced their cleverly named “tails for tails” program that donated $100k to the Humane Society. However, as a business that depends on agriculture for its product, it probably makes sense that, in hindsight, the agriculture community didn’t find it to be such a clever program.  The HSUS’s efforts to advocate against factory farming haven’t resonated with animal farmers, who have recently mobilized online in a big way, and took over virtually all of yellowtail’s social media assets. The #yellowtail tagging is rampant on twitter, youtube videos are popping up daily, and at this point, any real [yellow tail] FB fans have rendered themselves moot or mute…take your pick.  Though in the last couple days, a few friends of the HSUS have started to voice their support.

yellow-tail

(more…)

How many store catalogs did you get in the mail this holiday season?  At home, I had a pile about two feet high-with about 75 or more catalogs from brick and mortar shops such as Brookstone, Eddie Bauer, L.L. Bean, Victoria’s Secret and online/direct mail only brands such as Harry & David, Catalog Favorites, Solutions, Red Envelope, etc.   At work, I had a pile of about 14 from the same brands AND from obscure “how did they get my name” places like Fairytale Brownies.

I reluctantly admit that I read through every single one of those catalogs-I circled items, I compared costs on like objects, and the content became reading material of wishful thinking for me after getting home from a hard day’s work.  I actually enjoyed the time I put aside to look at the mail order catalogs after my son was in bed and my husband was absorbed in the local hockey game.  I’m a busy mom so this downtime, in an effort to not feel unproductive, became “necessary preparatory work” for the holidays.

But what was illuminating to me was that my purchasing behavior only extended down two pathways.  The first was that I ordered online for only a few purchases that I had picked out for gifts from the catalogs.  The second was that I remembered and/or noted specials on my Blackberry memo pad when I was actually in stores where I could handle the items tactiley.  Not once did I reach for a phone to call in my order.  And as strong as my wishful thinking was, it did not translate into actual purchases for many of what I would have bought had I had more money to spend.

(more…)

Photo courtesy of William Stadler and stock.xchngThis past weekend, a few of the kids in my neighborhood came over to our house to play with my daughter. The group, ranging in ages from 5 to 9, went off to the family room for a while, and for about within 15 minutes things were pretty quiet.

“Dad, you have to come eat at our restaurant,” called my daughter.

When I walked into the family room the scene was abuzz with activity. Kids were rushing around everywhere with toy food, plates, utensils and cookware. Each was wearing a few articles of dress-up clothes and busily handling different jobs in what appeared to be a pretend restaurant.

The Brand Concept

“Welcome to Fasty’s, where our specialty is super fast service!” said the eight-year-old as I was lead to a small table set for dinner. I sat down and within seconds had toy bread, cookies and a drink cup set in front of me. “Can I take your order?”

These kids didn’t just imagine a pretend restaurant, but they named it, branded it and gave it a very specific niche: super fast service. They were wearing uniforms to show that they were part of a team and from the amount of running back and forth that we going on they were certainly being true to the brand image that they had created.

The Brand Experience

I was impressed, so I gave them my order. The two kids rushed around gathering up the toy food that I had requested and delivered it at almost a sprint to my table. Meanwhile a third brought over a new drinking cup “in case I wanted something else to drink”, and a fourth brought over some wooden cupcakes which were “on the house”. I was told that it was to make sure that I had a wonderful time here at Fasty’s.

So these elementary school aged kids had not only created a differentiated brand, but everything that they were doing was contributing to that brand experience. And they threw in a few premiums to ensure that my experience with that brand was a positive one. Good thinking.

Customer Relationships, Two-Way Dialogue and the Web

Finally, after I had pretended to eat all the food that had been placed in front of me, the 9-year-old came over to the table.

“Hi, I’m the manager,” she shook my hand. “We’re so glad that you came in to eat at Fasty’s. I hope that you had a wonderful time here. Please leave us some feedback on our website. It’s at www.fastys.com. We would really appreciate it.”

Wow. My first thought was ‘This kid eats out too much.’ But then it occurred to me that, not only did these kids understand the importance of developing great customer relationships with a personal touch and the need to create a two-way dialogue with customers, but they understood a bit about the web as a marketing tool. I was impressed. They probably don’t know that they understand these things, of course. To them, that’s just the way things are when you have a business.

A clearly differentiated brand with a strong concept behind it. A consistent experience that support that brand position. Great customer service and extra touches to ensure it. Two-way dialogue with the consumer. And digital taking an integral role. These are all essential elements for building most brands these days, but how often do we as marketers cut corners when it comes to these things, or ignore them altogether? Too often. Perhaps we can learn - or at least be reminded of - a thing or two about brand building from a bunch of kids playing restaurant.

So the next time that you take a look at your own brand, ask yourself: “what would a kid do?”

There has been a lot of debate lately about whether or not TV spots should get tagged with the web site URL. Seems like a no brainer. But we’ve gotten some pushback from clients on 15-second spots in particular, where the message needs to be crystal clear and words and visuals are at a premium. Before you cut the URL from the storyboard, consider this:

 

Last September, we had two products in the same category go on air.

 

Product A tagged their spot with a web address. It was simply an onscreen super.

Product B did not.

 

During the first month of launch, Product A experienced a 1017% increase in site traffic.

Product B’s traffic increased by only 122%. The net difference was a 403% lift in site traffic for Product A.

 

So add the URL! Better still, promote your site in the voice over. And don’t forget to greet the user with an engaging experience when they land there.

To improve conversions, focus on providing relevant and persuasive content based on a sound understanding of visitor intent. Persuade on every page. Link pages together to guide visitors along the way. Hold their hands, and anticipate their every move. Make them feel comfortable and in control.

The more time a visitor spends on your site, the more likely she is to buy. Shopping carts experience the highest drop-off in the first two or three pages. Once they’re into the process, drop-off rates decline precipitously.

More e-Commerce best practices:

(more…)

In case you missed it, Brunner’s Chief Digital Officer and Silicon Angle founder Mark ‘Rizzn’ Hopkins had an interesting discussion about the biggest digital trends of 2009.  We would love to hear your thoughts as to what the biggest trends were!

thumbnail1

Not that long ago, I got the chance to speak at Advertising Week DC, and presented a case study of a piece we did for DeVry University. I call it a “piece,” but really it’s a whole bunch of tightly-meshed moving parts that include a mobile app; a live, projected classroom presentation, a 3D world with avatars and quirky aliens, a site, custom email follow-up, and some social tools that, collectively, help establish an engaging and ongoing relationship between DeVry and prospective students.

The “piece” is cool — which is probably why it was a Mobi finalist in two categories — with the likes of Fanta and Comedy Central. But the presentation I gave wasn’t just about the mechanics of the parts. It was about the kind of thinking that defines — or should define — creative in a contemporary agency setting.

When I started in the business, which was longer ago than I will specify here, I was a copywriter. I worked with words. They paired me with an art director, who’s specialty was pictures. Together, our job was to combine words and pictures, and fit them into a pre-determined space, defined primarily by physical dimensions or time. Occasionally, when we were paying close attention, context also entered into it. Our goal was to be really clever with those words and pictures — clever enough to distract a target from his or her primary goal, just long enough to get in a good word about our client’s brand. And that was the essence of advertising creativity: Being really good at combining words and pictures, in spaces someone had already set aside for you.

I don’t have to tell you that times have changed for you to know that times have changed. The opportunity, technology, and culture certainly exist in our digital world for creatives to think, not just in terms of words and pictures, but in terms of, “What if?”

Beyond working in predetermined spaces, creatives are now required to think in terms of experience — and that doesn’t just open new doors, so much as it removes the concept of closed doors altogether. Online, anything is possible — or a reasonable and accepted facsimile of anything is possible, anyway — which means when you’re creating you can pretty much create anything in the way of an experience for a prospective fan of your client’s brand. The question isn’t “What’s the headline?” so much as it is: “What happens next?” and “What if it/they did this?” All of which makes advertising in general, and creative in particular, harder than it used to be. More fun, but harder.

In order to combat that difficulty, and assign some sort of predictable monetary value to pieces of an endless online space, we’ve carved that space into lots of more predictable units of predetermined size and shape. There are banners, sites, microsites, fan pages, groups, tweets, and a whole host of other pre-defined spaces on the web, just waiting for creatives to fill them. Pretty much all of them are extremely useful — some, even critical. All benefit from the creatives’ skill. But if you take them all — every last one of them — and pile them together, they still don’t make even a tiny dent in the universe of possibilities. The web isn’t a zero-sum game like broadcast or printed publications. There can always be more pixels. Which means the pixels can always do something to create an experience that no one has experienced yet.

Words and pictures are still important. In fact, that’s an understatement. Recent studies finally prove what creatives have known all along — that the quality of the creative has a huge impact on the effectiveness of online advertising. But words and pictures aren’t the only elements of creative anymore. Creative has moving parts. Lots of them. When they mesh together properly, they create an experience. And that experience can be, literally, anything. If you want to make it good, understanding existing and emerging tools is the cost of entry. If, however, you want to change the game, begin with a simple question:

“What if?”